What makes a good deck? Analysis of some of the best and worst
At some point every investor has the same quiet experience. It’s early, their inbox is full, and three pitch decks arrive without context. No intro...
VCMatch Team
At some point every investor has the same quiet experience. It’s early, their inbox is full, and three pitch decks arrive without context. No intro. No warm note. Just files. They open one out of curiosity.
The first slide is a slogan. The second is a quote from a famous founder. The third announces a trillion-dollar market. By the fifth slide, the investor still doesn’t know what the company actually does. The deck isn’t bad—it’s just asking too much work from the reader. It closes, unnoticed, and never comes back up.
The second deck opens differently. One sentence explains the problem in plain language. Another explains the solution just as simply. Nothing clever. Nothing hidden. Within thirty seconds, the investor understands the business well enough to explain it to someone else. That alone buys another few minutes of attention. This is where good decks quietly separate themselves from the rest.
A strong deck is not a presentation; it’s a narrative compressed into ten or twelve moments of clarity. The best founders understand that investors aren’t looking to be impressed—they’re looking to reach conviction quickly. That idea shows up again and again in investor guidance, from Y Combinator’s essays on fundraising to the long-circulated pitch outline published by Sequoia Capital. Different firms, same underlying logic: make the business obvious, make the timing unavoidable, and make belief feel rational.
The decks investors remember tend to unfold like a short story. First, they establish the world as it exists today and why it’s broken. Then they introduce a new way of seeing that problem—often enabled by a shift in technology, cost, regulation, or behavior. This “why now” moment is subtle but essential. Without it, even a good idea feels optional. Sequoia explicitly calls this out in its pitch guidance, and it’s why so many great decks feel inevitable rather than ambitious.
Once that foundation is set, the best decks introduce evidence, not aspiration. This is where narrative turns into proof. Early traction, customer pull, usage growth—these aren’t victory laps, they’re credibility anchors. DocSend’s widely cited fundraising analyses show that investors spend surprisingly little time per slide, but they slow down when something feels real. Evidence does that. It changes the internal question from “is this true?” to “how big could this get?”
Design plays a quiet but decisive role here. The most effective decks don’t feel designed at all. Each slide carries one idea, expressed cleanly enough that it survives being skimmed. This is why so many investors still point to Airbnb’s original pitch deck. It wasn’t beautiful, but it was legible. Every slide advanced the story. Nothing competed for attention. Good design, in a deck, is empathy.
The decks that fail tend to fail for narrative reasons, not market ones. Some hide the business behind language that sounds impressive but explains nothing. Others lean on massive market sizes as a substitute for a clear wedge, hoping scale will stand in for strategy. Many collapse under the weight of their own features, mistaking a list of capabilities for a reason to exist. These patterns show up even in famous post-mortems—WeWork’s pre-IPO materials are often referenced not because they were confusing, but because they told a selective story that avoided the hardest truths.
What ultimately makes a deck good is not polish or length or even traction. It’s whether the story holds together under pressure. Can an investor summarize the company in one sentence after closing the file? Does the timing make sense without heroic assumptions? Do the numbers, however early, support the narrative rather than decorate it? Investor essays from Y Combinator, Sequoia’s pitch framework, and even Guy Kawasaki’s old but still relevant 10/20/30 rule all orbit the same constraint: attention is scarce, and clarity compounds.
A good deck doesn’t try to persuade through volume. It persuades by making understanding effortless. When that happens, the follow-up email writes itself, the meeting gets scheduled, and the deck does what it was always meant to do—not raise money on its own, but open the door to belief.
About VCMatch Team
The VCMatch team helps founders connect with the right investors through AI-powered matching.
Ready to find your perfect VC match?
Upload your pitch deck and get instantly matched with investors who are actively looking for companies like yours
Get StartedRelated Articles
The Metrics That Actually Matter to VCs
Metric OverloadFounders often track dozens of metrics. Investors care about far fewer. Understanding which metrics ma...
From Seed to Series A: Timing Your Next Round
The Critical TransitionThe jump from seed to Series A is where many startups stumble. It's not just about raising mor...